MunkiSee MunkiSee
Log in Get started
Buyer's guide · Reviewed August 2026

Employee monitoring software for Australian teams: seven tools, sorted by the job

This is not a ranking. "Best employee monitoring software" is an unanswerable question, because the seven products below are not competing for the same job — a payroll timer and a data-loss prevention platform have almost nothing in common except the category page they land on.

So: work out which job you are hiring for, then read only that section. And read the legal section before you shortlist, not after — in Australia the notice you owe your staff depends on which state they sit in, and it changes what you are allowed to buy.

Written by MunkiSee, who make one of the seven. We have put ours in its actual category rather than at the top, and named what it cannot do.

Start here: which job?

Almost every failed rollout we hear about is a category error — a team that wanted attendance data bought a surveillance platform, or a team with a genuine insider-threat problem bought a timer. Find the sentence that sounds like yours.

If the real question is…You are shopping forLook at
"Is this person at their machine during the hours we agreed?" Presence and attendance MunkiSee
"How many hours do I owe this contractor, and against which client?" Time tracking and billing Hubstaff, Time Doctor
"What is our working day actually made of?" Workforce analytics ActivTrak, Insightful
"Is somebody about to walk out with our customer list?" Insider threat and DLP Teramind, Veriato
"Who is at risk of burning out, and where is the workload landing?" People analytics Intelogos, ActivTrak

The seven

In category order, not preference order.

01 · PRESENCE AND ATTENDANCE

MunkiSee

The job: confirming that the people you employ are at their machines during the hours you agreed, across a Windows fleet, without recording anything about what they are doing.

MunkiSee reports one thing per device — active, idle or offline — and when that changed. It has no screen capture, no keystroke logging, no app or website history, and no per-person productivity percentage. Outside the hours you configure, nothing is written at all: not "idle", not "offline". There is nothing to review because nothing was recorded.

That narrowness is the pitch. It makes the tool defensible in a staff meeting, it makes the privacy review short, and it means the tray icon showing the real state at all times costs us nothing to promise. It also licences a device rather than a timesheet, so shared kiosks, warehouse terminals and shift PCs that nobody logs hours against are measured like everything else.

Where it loses: Windows only — no macOS, no Linux, no mobile. No payroll, no invoicing, no project attribution, no GPS, no DLP. If you need to know what someone was working on rather than whether they were at the machine, this is the wrong tool and no configuration fixes that.

Pricing · Security · 14-day trial, no seat limit

02 · TIME TRACKING AND BILLING

Hubstaff

The job: turning tracked hours into money — contractor payments, client invoices, payroll — and following field staff who are not at a desk at all.

Hubstaff is a time tracker first. Its GPS and geofencing are a genuine strength for trades, delivery and field service, and its payroll integrations mean the hours you track are the hours you pay without a re-key. It offers optional screenshots and app and URL tracking, and derives an activity percentage from keyboard and mouse rates.

Worth knowing: that activity percentage is a good proxy for typing and a poor one for working — reading a contract or being on a customer call scores badly. Once the number exists, someone will manage to it.

Full MunkiSee vs Hubstaff comparison →

03 · TIME TRACKING AND PRODUCTIVITY COACHING

Time Doctor

The job: attributing time to projects and tasks, and prompting people in the moment when their attention drifts.

Time Doctor is built around a person starting a timer against a task. It records applications and websites, offers optional screenshots, and is well established with distributed and outsourced teams where the client needs to see what was worked on, not just for how long. Its idle prompts and distraction alerts are a real feature for some teams and an irritant to others.

Worth knowing: the model assumes a person who logs hours. Devices that nobody starts a timer on — shared terminals, kiosks — are outside what it is designed to see.

Full MunkiSee vs Time Doctor comparison →

04 · WORKFORCE ANALYTICS

ActivTrak

The job: understanding what the working day is made of at team and organisation level — which applications dominate, where meeting load falls, how focus time is distributed.

ActivTrak classifies applications and websites as productive or unproductive and builds analytics and benchmarks from that classification. It is the most analytically serious of the app-tracking tools, and it markets itself towards aggregate insight rather than individual policing — though the underlying per-person data exists regardless of how you present it.

Worth knowing: the productivity classification is a set of judgements somebody has to maintain, and it is where the arguments happen. Budget time for tuning it, and expect to defend it.

Full MunkiSee vs ActivTrak comparison →

05 · WORKFORCE ANALYTICS

Insightful

The job: the same analytics question as ActivTrak, generally aimed at smaller teams and often bought for remote-team visibility.

Insightful (formerly Workpuls) covers app and website tracking, time on task, and optional screenshots, with a lighter footprint and a simpler onboarding than the enterprise analytics platforms. Reasonable shortlist entry if ActivTrak reads as more product than you need.

Worth knowing: the feature set overlaps heavily with ActivTrak and Time Doctor, so the decision usually comes down to price, support and which dashboard your managers will actually open.

06 · INSIDER THREAT AND DATA-LOSS PREVENTION

Teramind

The job: detecting and stopping someone taking data out of your organisation, and producing evidence afterwards.

Teramind is a security product, not an attendance tool, and it records at the depth that job requires: screen and session recording, keystrokes, file and clipboard movement, email and messaging content, with policy rules that can block an action rather than merely log it. If you handle regulated data and your threat model includes your own staff, nothing lighter is a substitute.

Worth knowing: that depth is also the risk. Deploying it because you want attendance data means collecting the content of your staff's working lives to answer a question a presence tool answers, and it is very hard to walk that back once the capability is installed. Also the one on this list most likely to need a formal surveillance policy and a conversation with your lawyers.

Full MunkiSee vs Teramind comparison →

07 · PEOPLE ANALYTICS

Intelogos

The job: reading workload and wellbeing signals — burnout risk, overwork, disengagement — rather than compliance.

Intelogos positions monitoring data as an input to people management: strengths, weaknesses and burnout indicators surfaced per person, with recommendations aimed at managers. It is the friendliest framing in the category, and for a leadership team that genuinely wants to manage workload rather than attendance, that framing matters.

Worth knowing: the data underneath is still per-person activity data. A wellbeing dashboard and a performance dashboard are the same collection with a different label on the front, so the consent conversation with your staff is the same one either way.

The Australian part, which most shortlists skip

Monitoring staff in Australia is lawful and common. Doing it without telling them frequently is not, and the rules are state law rather than federal, so a national employer has more than one set to satisfy. This is a starting map, not legal advice — get advice before you deploy.

New South Wales and the ACT

Both have dedicated workplace surveillance legislation covering computer, camera and tracking surveillance. The general shape: employees must be given written notice a set period before surveillance starts, the notice has to say what kind of surveillance and how it will be carried out, and covert surveillance requires a magistrate's authority rather than a manager's decision.

Practically: you need a written surveillance policy and a dated notice, and you need to have issued them before the agent goes out — not on the day somebody notices it.

Victoria and the other states

There is no equivalent standalone workplace surveillance statute in most other states, but surveillance devices legislation still restricts recording private conversations and activities, and the Privacy Act's employee records exemption is narrower in practice than people assume — it does not cover contractors, and it does not make collection reasonable on its own.

Fair Work also matters independently: monitoring introduced without consultation has been argued as a workplace change, and evidence gathered improperly is a weak foundation for a dismissal.

Five questions to put to every vendor on your shortlist

1. What exactly is collected, in a list I can hand to staff?If the answer needs a call, the notice you owe your employees will need one too.
2. Can it be installed so nobody knows it is there?A product that can run covertly is a product somebody in your organisation can configure to. In NSW and the ACT that is a decision with legal consequences.
3. What happens outside working hours, and on a personal device?"We collect but do not display it" is a different answer from "nothing is recorded", and only one of them survives a subject access request well.
4. Where does the data live, and can I get all of it out?Ask for the region in writing, ask what the export contains, and ask what deletion actually deletes.
5. Who inside the vendor can see my data?Support access is normal; unlogged support access is not. Ask whether it is audited and whether you can see the log.

Questions we get asked

Is employee monitoring legal in Australia?

Generally yes, on employer-owned equipment and for a legitimate business purpose. What varies is notice: New South Wales and the ACT have specific workplace surveillance laws requiring written notice before it starts, and covert surveillance there needs a magistrate's authority. Get advice for your states before deploying.

Do I have to tell staff?

In NSW and the ACT, in writing and in advance, yes. Everywhere else it is still the right call: monitoring discovered rather than announced is the version that damages trust, and it is the version that goes badly at the Fair Work Commission.

Which tool is least intrusive?

Ours, and we would say that — but the test is not our word, it is what the agent is capable of. Ask each vendor whether the capability exists at all, not whether it is switched off by default. A setting can be changed; missing code cannot.

Can any of these keep data in Australia?

Cloud region availability differs by vendor and by plan, so ask for it in writing rather than assuming. If the requirement is absolute, self-hosting removes the question entirely — MunkiSee and Teramind are the two on this list that offer it.

Reviewed August 2026 against each vendor's publicly available product documentation and positioning. Nothing here is legal advice — the summary of Australian workplace surveillance law is a starting point for a conversation with your own adviser, not a substitute for one, and the legislation is amended. Hubstaff, Time Doctor, ActivTrak, Insightful, Teramind, Veriato and Intelogos are trademarks of their respective owners, used here only to identify the products discussed; MunkiSee is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of them. Products change quickly — verify anything that matters to your decision on the vendor's own site, and tell us if something here has gone out of date.

If the job is presence, this is the short shortlist.

14 days, no seat limit, no card. Run it beside whatever else you are trialling and compare what each one actually told you.

Start a free trial See the head-to-heads